ER-to-family mapping from ternary or any other large-training dating

ER-to-family mapping from ternary or any other large-training dating

Even when we do this, i have various other question: in the event the a buyers metropolitan areas numerous sales for a passing fancy big date, the customer probably anticipates these to are still various other.

Therefore, alternatively, a much more preferred means (which also allows several invoices on one date) should be to make Charge an organization, having artificial secret invoice_num . That is, i claim that sales was “things” as opposed to relationships. This is certainly an example of a really standard strategy that might become called the man-made-trick secret : convert good putative relationship to an entity of the delegating a beneficial “serial count” to each tuple about matchmaking. In this situation the latest artificial key possess a natural translation: we count per buy since it is put. To your work_into the relationship of Company database we may have fun with a plastic key named Occupations_Assignment_Num; to your Work_Having relationship ranging from Professionals and you may Divisions we might explore Business_Association_Num.

If we manage an organization Charge, that have attributes Cust_id and you can Purchase_day and you can acknowledged by charge_num, we’re going to create a romance Invoice_Goods, ranging from Charge and you will Items, which have qualities for rate and you can amounts. This dining table effortlessly listing what confirmed Charge in fact has:

I pertain Invoice_Goods as its very own desk record charge amounts, area wide variety and you may volume. An important key is the pair ?invoice_num, part_num?; brand new table comes with a characteristic to own number (and possibly but also for latest_price, and for discount). The brand new Invoice desk (dining table Orders on the dellstore databases) in itself may look in this way:

Dining table Charge_Goods The fresh Invoice_Items table features a genuine twin-feature key, because signifies an Meters:Letter matchmaking between statements and parts. (Even when keep in mind that, regarding Dellstore, an important secret getting Orderlines is truly the synthetic trick OrderlineID.)

  • The original Invoice dating ended up being ternary rather than binary
  • When we made Charge an organization , utilising the artificial-secret key , we just had that purely-binary dining table to apply

I changed you to type-of-digital matchmaking Invoice anywhere between Customer and you may Spend the an alternate organization Invoice which have digital matchmaking to each off Buyers and you may Region

Check out the Supply matchmaking with the a merchant s, investment j, and you can area p. The tuple ?s,j,p? is roofed if seller s supplies part p to have venture j.

Charge ——— Invoice_Item ———- Area | wide variety (Indeed, Invoice also has a love Bought_Of the so you can Customers; that’s Letter:step one thus i has actually immediately accompanied it by the addition of a beneficial Cust_id feature so you’re able to Invoice

We would just be sure to model that it which have about three digital relationships, SUPPLIES(s,j), CAN_SUPPLY(s,p), and Spends(j,p). It is true that if ?s,j,p? is during Likewise have, upcoming ?s,j? is during Provides, ?s,p? is actually Can be_Also have, and you will ?j,p? is during Spends. But the converse is not real (example). Whenever we generate the 3 binary mirar a estos chicos dining tables, we cannot reconstruct the fresh new ternary table.

You to definitely means is to model good ternary relationship as the a faltering entity, that have three identifying matchmaking (Fig seven.17(c)). Normally, this is complete only if the root Er-acting units do not support ternary relationship. Brand new resulting entity contains the necessary three-attribute key to determine the fresh new ternary relationship truthfully.

Instead, we are able to promote Supply a plastic material (“surrogate”) secret, supply_id, and then connect it to Supplier, Enterprise, And you may Part from the binary dating. The latest artificial trick carry out exclusively determine a beneficial ?s,j,p? triple; we can say which inside SQL by the stating that ?s,j,p? was a holiday trick. With a plastic material secret there is an organization Have, which have secret also have_id lorsque, along with about three relationships SUPPLIES3(lorsque, s, j), CAN_SUPPLY3(lorsque,s,p) and you can USES3(si,j,p). We may nonetheless you would like a ternary dating explaining the relationship out-of every three, but throughout the organization Likewise have(supply_id, seller, pro j ect, part) we could today rebuild the original ternary desk.

درباره صادق ندیمی:

نقش: نویسنده
20326 نوشته ی وی را ببینید

دیدگاهتان را بنویسید

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد.

تمام ایمیل ها و تماس های تلفنی سریعاً پاسخ داده می شوند ولی چنانچه از یک روش تماس پاسخ نگرفتید حتماً با روش دیگر تماس حاصل نمایید
Mobile: )+98( 9354167938 (Javad Hoseini) Tel: )+98-71( 36347903
طراحی سایت در آذر 87 توسط: ایران نوپندار
برای لود این صفحه 79 عملیات در 2 ثانیه انجام شد.